The laws on homosexuality differ depending on several factors: country, culture, manners, religion... Only since the mid-1990s that jurists began to seize the issue of homosexuality. This sudden interest and the positions that result are rooted in the scope of discussion that raises the issue of homosexuality in today's society.
Some European countries have taken in recent years, steps in the matter. The need for legislation is consistent with the changing mores and practices of gay couples in Europe. The recognition of homosexual families, alongside parent families as there are very many in Europe, represents a decisive step. One key demand is the formal and legal recognition of the union of two persons of the same sex. Indeed, traditionally conceived as the union between a man and a woman, same sex couples could not start a family. But nowadays, marriage might then be envisaged as more involvement of two people no matter their sex.
[...] Regarding same-sex parents, the traditional idea of a family composed of father and mother is not the only feasible option today. Homosexual couples are not different from heterosexual couples. The only difference that there is a sex difference and no one can say that a same sex couple is not able to properly raise a child, as would parents of different sexes. Indeed, every human being has a maternal or paternal instinct and can therefore allow the child to an education as others. [...]
[...] Of course not, because the Declaration of Human Rights by the UNO said that all people regardless of gender, religion, opinions are equal. Consequently, two men or two women have every right to unite them before the law. Consider the first marriage in his corner hardware on the security it brings to both spouses, with duties towards each other. The right to marry and to found a family is considered a fundamental right of the person (Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights). Starting a family does not procreation. [...]
[...] Various discussions and various projects are being developed to open adoption to same-sex couples. Indeed, many single gay men, who have adopted children or have raised their own children from a previous heterosexual relationship, live couple, but their partner has no legal existence as a "parent". I. Strongest argument against my position 1. Society Homosexuals have all the rights of citizens, they have the right to be free (and duty of being, like everyone else), but they are not free to have rights as a species - for they are not a "species". [...]
[...] The Koran regards homosexuality as a serious deviation in the divine law. For Muslims, gay marriage is unthinkable because accepting would allow a break in the chain of generations that perpetuates the existence of the Muslim community. The Koran seeks to purify society, which is why Islamic governments kill the homosexual, by the application of religious principles. A good Muslim should not be gay or accept same-sex couples because the law does not authorize it Human nature There is no doubt that homosexuals have rights, as human beings, they have all the rights directly tied to human nature, natural rights. [...]
[...] I think this view is the more correct regarding homosexuality. Thus emerged pastors gay, homosexual unions within Protestantism Human nature Homosexuals are not inherently distinctive. They belong to all age groups, all ethnic communities, all social classes. Only a minority of homosexuals adopt distinctive features related to the adoption of specific codes of appearance. Those that the public ends up seeing are the most extroverted and exuberant than the media highlight. Therefore, homosexuality is a choice that can only be explained by the phrase: attracted to by the opposite sex" is like if someone asked you why you love this colour, or why you love this meat . [...]
Bibliographie, normes APA
Citez le doc consultéLecture en ligne
et sans publicité !Contenu vérifié
par notre comité de lecture
